Limit Ammunition To Control Hand Guns

Limit Ammunition To Control Hand Guns"Several hundred thousand" replies have flooded
April 30, 1975in.Eventually, the U.S. Supreme Court may decide the
Those who would ban hand guns might well considerissue.While hand guns can be manufactured and
the old riddle: "Which comes first, the chicken or thesmuggled easily, the production of bullet-quality
egg?"A few cities have adopted legislation prohibitinggunpowder requires highly developed technology.In
pistols, revolvers and the so-called "Saturday Nightaddition, the manufacture of a shell casing requires a
Specials" in a effort to halt the soaring crime rate.Solarge, expensive, highly accurate stamping press. Only
far, the effort has been like trying to empty thea very few factories, in the United States are
ocean with a tea spoon. The next town over sellscapable of making primer shells which sportsmen
cheap weapons, and no questions asked.Congress,sometimes fill with commercially manufactured
therefore, seems about ready to consider thegunpowder.In short, there are only a few sources of
controversial proposal seriously. Certainly only asupply for powder and shells. The supply should be
nation-wide ban has any chance to be effective.Irelatively easy to regulate.Cut off the supply of
support hand gun legislation, but oppose attempts toammunition, and hand guns will rust into quaint
curtail shoulder guns.Pocket guns, capable of beingsouvenirs.Rifle-calibre ammunition could continue to be
concealed, are short range weapons of surprise andmade available readily in hardware and sports
vengeance. Rifles, however, are carried openly. Theystores.Revolver-calibre cartridges, however, could be
are useful for sport and defense against armies offurnished only to the military and law enforcement
invasion.Gun control is impractical simply because ofauthorities. Those with a legitimate need for revolver
the ease with which hand guns can be built,shells for their freely-owned - but registered - hand
transported and concealed.Which brings us to theguns would have to obtain them from the police
chicken and egg puzzle.Exactly three years ago in thisafter positive identification and finger printing.
column, I suggested that we give up trying to limitPurchases might be limited to five shells, and empty
the gun and approach the problem through the moreshells could be returned for replacement.Thus, those
vulnerable route of ammunition.Gun control advocatescitizens genuinely needing a hand gun for protection
dismissed the idea as "simplistic." The lateor other legitimate needs would not be denied an
Congressman Frank Bow circulated the column to a"equalizer".Criminals, of course, would still obtain both
few gun-control legislators but got an indifferentpistols and ammunition from abroad or from other
reaction.Now comes an Illinois citizens' group calledcriminal sources. Yet, we must try to control hand
the Committee for Handgun Control, Inc., which isguns SENSIBLY even if the odds are as hopeless as
seeking to force the US. Government to ban the salethey seem to be.In controlling hand guns we must be
of hand gun ammunition as a means of controllingcareful that we don't simply disarm the citizen while
cheap hand guns.The group has petitioned the newleaving weapons in the hands of gangsters.Also, we
federal Consumer Product Safety Commission to banmust not abrogate our constitutional right to "keep
ammunition on grounds it is hazardous, and that theand bear arms." The way the world is going these
commission has jurisdiction over hazardousdays, this right may not be as obsolete and academic
substances.This is the hand gun committee's secondas the gun control enthusiasts would have us
attempt to force the commission. A year ago thebelieve.Ammunition is the weak link in the chain of
commission ruled that banning ammunition wouldfire-arm use. Break it and we stop wanton shooting
amount to a "back door" ban on hand guns, a directby citizens and criminal alike.Lindsey Williams is a Sun
violation of law that established thecolumnist who can be contacted at:Website: with
commission.Nevertheless the hand gun committee hasseveral hundred of Lin's Editorial & At Large articles
won a court suit requiring the commission towritten over 40 years.Also featured in its entirety is
reconsider, which it is now doing.Two months agoLin's groundbreaking book "Boldly Onward," that
the product safety commission asked the public tocritically analyzes and develops theories about the
comment on the proposal to ban ammunition.original Spanish explorers of America.