US Army Values Weapons Over Armor

US Army Values Weapons Over Armorthey either prepare for shipment overseas or return
August 2nd, 2006 3:29PM California TimeIn this firstto the States for repair and refurbishment.This
article, titled: 'Inside Source Says US Military Supplyingsource maintains that the US Military is NOT, repeat,
Defective Protective Gear' we learned that thenot utilizing these materials in the protection of our
United States Army was at the time providingsoldiers, even though a manufacturer has been
inadequate and defective bullet-proofing materials toacquired and over 1000 actual armor plate units have
our troops on the ground in Iraq.The status of thebeen shipped to the Military for installment on these
provisions for our troops cited therein came after anvehicles. Our source goes on to decry the lack of
enormous outcry on a nationwide level, demandingfloor plating used in armoring ground vehicles.This
that the military provide our forces with the bestauthor will state that while 'special tools' may not be
protection available.In the wake of the reportrequired to drop plate armor onto the floor of a
regarding the materials obtained and utilized fromvehicle, it does take a significant amount of work to
Logistics Support Systems, my sources haveexpose the floor of the vehicle before the plating
informed me that the primary manufacturer ofcan be attached. Helicopter seats don't just 'pop' in
defense technology for US Aircraft (Helicoptersand out. Neither do seats on a Humvee or
specifically) has been replaced. I never received aAmbrams.ArmorWorks (cited above), has stated
response from Logistic Support Systems defendingpublicly that,
their product, or offering any sort of evidence to"Our Ballistic Advantage Armor Kit has received
justify it's use in Iraq. Nor have I been able toArmy safety release from the U.S. Army Aberdeen
independently verify that Logistics Support SystemsEvaluation Center. These tests not only certify the
was indeed the primary supplier of these defectiveArmor against Small Arms, Mine Blast, and Improvised
and inadequate defense measures.It appears nowExplosive Devices (IEDs), but also demonstrate the
that the US Army has found the materials the publicvehicles road worthiness both on and off road."My
is demanding. To date, however, I've seen noquestion, along with millions of other American
evidence of a purchase order.The Company (oneCitizens, then becomes simple.If the US Military has
among many) providing these materials, can be foundbeen provided with field tested equipment, capable
online at:of providing protection from every weapon known
to the information available on their website, theyto be used in the field against our troops while
provide Seat Armor for the CH47 Chinook Helicopter.occupying Iraq, why is this equipment not in
The specifications for this are listed asplace?The stated reason for not up-armoring vehicles
follows:7.62mm AP ProtectionAl2O3 Armorwas exactly the same from all 3 sources within the
SystemBallistic First ArticleLot Acceptance TestTheUS Army that have verified this report.That reason
part is listed as 'Mission Dependent' meaning it canbeing, "When you up-armor a vehicle, it adds a lot of
either be used or not at the discretion of the USweight. This makes that vehicle unable to carry the
Military.Similar parts, advertised with similar specs,payload the mission requires. Usually it's a choice
claim to protect both the floor of the cockpit, and ofbetween sending in our troops and weapons with
the passenger cabin, respectively. They arelittle or no protection, or not sending them in at
promoted as able to be installed by 'front-lineall."This author for one would choose not sending
personnel' and do not require special tools in 'most'them at all, but to the point, this report makes it
cases.One of the sources bringing this information toclear where the priorities of the US Army lie.
you happens to work in the armoring of vehicles as