| US Army Values Weapons Over Armor
| |
| | vehicles as they either prepare for
|
| August 2nd, 2006 3:29PM California
| |
| | shipment overseas or return to the States
|
| TimeIn this first article, titled:
| |
| | for repair and refurbishment.This source
|
| 'Inside Source Says US Military Supplying
| |
| | maintains that the US Military is NOT,
|
| Defective Protective Gear' we learned
| |
| | repeat, not utilizing these materials in
|
| that the United States Army was at the
| |
| | the protection of our soldiers, even
|
| time providing inadequate and defective
| |
| | though a manufacturer has been acquired
|
| bullet-proofing materials to our troops
| |
| | and over 1000 actual armor plate units
|
| on the ground in Iraq.The status of the
| |
| | have been shipped to the Military for
|
| provisions for our troops cited therein
| |
| | installment on these vehicles. Our source
|
| came after an enormous outcry on a
| |
| | goes on to decry the lack of floor
|
| nationwide level, demanding that the
| |
| | plating used in armoring ground
|
| military provide our forces with the best
| |
| | vehicles.This author will state that
|
| protection available.In the wake of the
| |
| | while 'special tools' may not be required
|
| report regarding the materials obtained
| |
| | to drop plate armor onto the floor of a
|
| and utilized from Logistics Support
| |
| | vehicle, it does take a significant
|
| Systems, my sources have informed me that
| |
| | amount of work to expose the floor of the
|
| the primary manufacturer of defense
| |
| | vehicle before the plating can be
|
| technology for US Aircraft (Helicopters
| |
| | attached. Helicopter seats don't just
|
| specifically) has been replaced. I never
| |
| | 'pop' in and out. Neither do seats on a
|
| received a response from Logistic Support
| |
| | Humvee or Ambrams.ArmorWorks (cited
|
| Systems defending their product, or
| |
| | above), has stated publicly that,
|
| offering any sort of evidence to justify
| |
| | "Our Ballistic Advantage Armor Kit has
|
| it's use in Iraq. Nor have I been able to
| |
| | received Army safety release from the
|
| independently verify that Logistics
| |
| | U.S. Army Aberdeen Evaluation Center.
|
| Support Systems was indeed the primary
| |
| | These tests not only certify the Armor
|
| supplier of these defective and
| |
| | against Small Arms, Mine Blast, and
|
| inadequate defense measures.It appears
| |
| | Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), but
|
| now that the US Army has found the
| |
| | also demonstrate the vehicles road
|
| materials the public is demanding. To
| |
| | worthiness both on and off road."My
|
| date, however, I've seen no evidence of a
| |
| | question, along with millions of other
|
| purchase order.The Company (one among
| |
| | American Citizens, then becomes simple.If
|
| many) providing these materials, can be
| |
| | the US Military has been provided with
|
| found online at:
| |
| | field tested equipment, capable of
|
| to the information available on their
| |
| | providing protection from every weapon
|
| website, they provide Seat Armor for the
| |
| | known to be used in the field against our
|
| CH47 Chinook Helicopter. The
| |
| | troops while occupying Iraq, why is this
|
| specifications for this are listed as
| |
| | equipment not in place?The stated reason
|
| follows:7.62mm AP ProtectionAl2O3 Armor
| |
| | for not up-armoring vehicles was exactly
|
| SystemBallistic First ArticleLot
| |
| | the same from all 3 sources within the US
|
| Acceptance TestThe part is listed as
| |
| | Army that have verified this report.That
|
| 'Mission Dependent' meaning it can either
| |
| | reason being, "When you up-armor a
|
| be used or not at the discretion of the
| |
| | vehicle, it adds a lot of weight. This
|
| US Military.Similar parts, advertised
| |
| | makes that vehicle unable to carry the
|
| with similar specs, claim to protect both
| |
| | payload the mission requires. Usually
|
| the floor of the cockpit, and of the
| |
| | it's a choice between sending in our
|
| passenger cabin, respectively. They are
| |
| | troops and weapons with little or no
|
| promoted as able to be installed by
| |
| | protection, or not sending them in at
|
| 'front-line personnel' and do not require
| |
| | all."This author for one would choose not
|
| special tools in 'most' cases.One of the
| |
| | sending them at all, but to the point,
|
| sources bringing this information to you
| |
| | this report makes it clear where the
|
| happens to work in the armoring of
| |
| | priorities of the US Army lie.
|
